counter statistics
Politics News

Science and medicine are now political weapons used against Americans

Guest post by Lawrence Sellin, PhD

The diseases and deaths, the devastation of the US economy and the loss of livelihood caused by COVID-19 can rightly blame China.

However, the political contamination of science and medicine by our so-called leaders and its use of science and medicine as political weapons against the American people is no less criminal.

Today, the Biden regime selectively distributes life-saving monoclonal antibodies based on political criteria. In essence, they say ‘obey us, otherwise we will kill you’.

TREND: The Denver police officer and father of four take the jab and can not walk now

Due to their lies and the selected use of scientific and medical data for political purposes, the American people rightly lost confidence in the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health.

As a scientist, I can categorically state that the scientific and medical literature is now equally politically tainted.

At one time, prestigious medical journals, such as the British Lancet, were now useless political propaganda machines.

I easily read over 1,000 scientific and medical articles on COVID-19.

It was earlier that I would read the results and compare them with the results of other studies to draw conclusions. This is the scientific method.

Today, the first thing I do is look at the writers to determine if they are driven by political motives. Then I look at the results to determine if the results show signs of political prejudice before comparing them with the results of other studies I have also examined for political contagion.

Political interference with the scientific method severely impedes medical progress and brings us back to the dark ages of witchcraft and alchemy.

Failed government policies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic are the direct result of the political contamination of science and medicine.

From the outset, there has been too much emphasis on vaccines and deliberate suppression of early intervention therapies.

I blame the overemphasis on vaccines mainly on Anthony Fauci, who after two failed attempts to create vaccines for HIV and AIDS and Ebola, tried to save his bankrupt career with a COVID-19 vaccine, to the exclusion of all others possible treatments.

Early therapeutic intervention with combination therapies has been shown to reduce hospitalization and mortality. These include hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin, zinc, vitamins C and D, acetaminophen for fever and aspirin for blood clots.

Unlike the U.S. government, the government of El Salvador provided such citizens for home treatment.

For the majority of the pandemic, U.S. officials did not recommend treatment until one was so ill that hospitalization was necessary, which was then often too late.

We were all told to wait for the vaccine.

It is a scientific fact that the mass administration of vaccines during a pandemic is a risky medical strategy.

Highly contagious viruses will naturally and rapidly mutate from susceptibility to vaccines, causing new variants.

Furthermore, vaccines need to be safe and effective, both of which are questionable.

It is medical malpractice to give a boost to vaccines that are not safe or effective.

It resists common sense and is contrary to medical ethics to “do no harm in the first place” to set up vaccination with a still experimental vaccine for people who have been fully immunized against COVID-19 infection and to vaccinate young children, who are at greater risk due to vaccine side effects than COVID-19 infection.

The latter is in my opinion Dr. Mengele-like behavior. This is similar to the medical experimentation in Nazi death camps.

There needs to be a full re-evaluation of the COVID-19 national policy approach, including a proper balance between therapies and vaccines.

It is indeed ironic, perhaps tragic, that vaccine maker Pfizer is now testing a daily pill as a preventative treatment for COVID-19. The Pfizer remedy aims to block a key enzyme that has to repeat the virus.

Ivermectin does the same.

It is not an exaggeration to say that those who have pursued national health policies and still do, literally have blood on their hands.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel of the U.S. Army and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He has had a civilian career in international affairs and medical research. His email address is [email protected].

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button