counter statistics
Politics News

The suspicion grows that Meadows has released Trump’s COVID bomb to divert the attention of the 1/6 committee

So much news has gone into the memory hole that it is almost impossible to remember the controversy that erupted when Donald Trump tested positive for COVID for the first time at the end of September-Early October 2020. knew that Trump tweeted he tested positive on Oct. 1 at 1 p.m., and that he was at Walter Reed Medical Center by 6 p.m. Mark Meadow’s new book reveals that Trump first tested positive for COVID three days before the first debate with Joe Biden. The debate took place on 27 September 2020. Trump met many people for five to six days and talked to them without a mask – knowing he had COVID.

Even at the time, it was hard to believe that the most tested and watched man in the world at that time could have received his first positive test in the middle of the night and then could have been extremely ill (much more than was first reported) by 18:00 that same day. Readers may remember wondering if Trump put people at risk at the Amy Cony-Barrett announcement, the first debate on September 27 (Trump was never tested, Biden was, they went on the first system. Questions arose Or he endangers Gold Star families.

Politico Playbook co-author and CNN contributor Rachel Bade discussed the matter on CNN this morning (video below), but appropriately focused just as much on why the bomb went off today. There is extremely reasonable speculation that the bigger picture may reveal an even more serious agenda. This news may break today to keep Trump and the public’s attention from Meadow’s much more important announcement yesterday, when he announced that he was cooperating with the January 6 committee, at least to a limited extent, he does not dare make a charge of offense.

Bade discussed the implications of the revelation on the positive test as well as the big picture:

“Look, there are going to be a lot of questions about intentional deception. The White House was, of course, very desperate to make it look like Trump did not have Covid. “

Bade noted how reckless the White House was at the time because of their agenda:

“They were prepared to do anything to keep him on track. So putting the lives of Gold Star Families and the future president at stake was something he was clearly prepared to risk. “

Bade then added, with almost ridiculous naivety, that she wondered what kind of accountability we could see coming from the fact that Trump lied to so many people and exposed them to active COVID. We have not yet seen liability for January 6, pardoned his friends or called election officials. We have seen nothing to suggest that Trump will be held accountable, even though the Trump team lied flat out about testing the negative – on the “first system” – before the debate. (Biden submitted his results)

Bade then came up with the bigger and much more relevant question:

“We only heard yesterday that Mark Meadows will be working with the committee on January 6, which was not exactly a headline he wanted … This is something that will not play well with Trump. Part of my wonder, it came out today specifically to try to sort cake across that storyline … “


One has two choices, believing that the two shocking revelations came out just by accident within the same 24-hour news cycle, or Meadow’s team deliberately released the shiny, flashy bosses about COVID in the hope that everyone forgets that it was announced yesterday that Meadows would cooperate with the committee of January 6th.

But this is where the interaction between the two can actually be informative. Yesterday, when Meadows announced he was going to work together, he said he would speak to the committee without violating executive privilege. The warning made the announcement almost useless. Meadows could sit for a statement and refuse to answer anything that might even affect Trump, or what happened as a result of Trump’s decisions. Alternatively, Meadows could talk about almost anything, perhaps in hopes of an immunity agreement, as President Biden waived executive privilege in the case and released the requested documentation. (Currently detained in court).

If Meadows essentially stood firm and planned to claim executive privilege up to ninety-five percent of the questions asked, he could easily have called Trump and said; “You will hear this announcement, but do not worry, I will claim executive privilege when they ask me to spell my name, I’m just trying to buy time.” But if Meadows is desperate to cover up the fact that he agreed to testify, it could very well mean that he did not say anything to Trump, precisely because he does not intend to make broad claims of executive privilege and in instead plans to do all or almost everything he knows.

For now, all we know is that Trump deliberately and willingly lied to the public, Gold Star families, Amy Coney-Barrett and Joe Biden, putting many people at risk of getting COVID before the vaccinations. We also suspect that it is highly likely that Meadows did not have a conversation with Trump about the limits he placed on his deposition, which is scheduled for next week.

We also know that everyone is watching this situation best.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock