counter statistics
Politics News

Two high-ranking generals lied about 1/6

One can not help but avoid the evidence that has been coming out for a long time, drip by drip, week by week, that January 6 was a coordinated conspiracy controlled at the highest levels of the White House, Congress, protest organizers and now the Pentagon .

As everyone remembers, long before the crowd even got to Congress, it became clear that the Capitol police would need the type of backup that only the National Guard could provide. In Washington DC (alone) that decision is made by the Pentagon and by the Pentagon, the president. There is no “governor” to call them out. And now most know that the Pentagon that day made some peculiar decisions to withhold those critically-needed National Guard troops.

Now a DC National Guard official has written a report alleging that two high-ranking Army generals lied to Congress in “rewriting” the Pentagon’s response to the January 6 riot. These allegations do not come out in a biased interview on CNN, the allegations come within a formal report, one that says two senior military leaders lied to Congress. The report is now in the hands of the House Select Committee.

According to Politics:

In a 36-page memorandum, col. Earl Matthews, who held high-level roles in the National Security Council and the Pentagon during the Trump administration, blamed the Pentagon’s inspector general for what he called an error-laden report protecting a top military official who argued. against the sending of the National Guard to the Capitol on January 6, which delayed the response to the uprising for hours.

Matthews’ memo, sent to the select committee of January 6 this month and acquired by POLITICO, contains detailed recollections of the insurgency response as it mentions two army generals – Gen. Charles Flynn, who served as deputy chief of staff for operations on January 6, and Lt.Gen. Walter Piatt, the director of military personnel – “absolute and unsaturated liars” for their characterization of the events of that day. Matthews has never publicly discussed the chaos of the Capitol siege.

Mike Flynn’s brother, the man in the chain of command to send the DC National Guard, Charles Flynn, right? And again, these would mean that you have to spend for these processes and if you have the right to do so. This was not said by anyone looking for airtime to sell a book. It is almost impossible to overemphasize the importance of the report. There have long been questions about the peculiar delay addressed in the report.

Matthews’ memo makes big accusations: that Flynn and Piatt lied to Congress about their response to pleas that the DC guard should be deployed quickly on January 6; that the Pentagon’s Inspector General’s November report on Army leadership’s response to the attack was “full of factual inaccuracies”; and that the military has created its own revised revisionist document on the Capitol riot that is “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korean propagandist.”

As Politico makes it clear, it is about troops sitting in the armory wondering why they are not being deployed. The delay has always been one of the most worrying signs that the whole day has been coordinated at the highest levels, a level high enough to control the Pentagon.

As stated above, these reports seem to be dripping week after week, more and more evidence inevitably pointing to a conspiracy involving dozens, perhaps more than a hundred people: the White House, the Trump family, the rally organizers, the Secret Service , members of Congress, and now the Pentagon. Everything related to evidence coming out only because Nancy Pelosi finally had enough and proceeded with a special committee to investigate January 6th.

Not a peep from DOJ, despite the fact that Mitch McConnell expect a criminal investigation on the day he voted “innocent” over Trump’s second prosecution.

Perhaps the Select Committee will do “too good a job” and literally force Merrick Garland’s hand by tying it all together. Because at some point, Garland, with enough evidence coming out and still no official DOJ criminal investigation, is going to start looking like part of the problem, with maybe his own agenda., There may come a point where he has to tell President Biden explain why law enforcement still hears evidence of – perhaps – the greatest crime against the US government in history, and yet the Department of Justice has only prosecuted the window-breakers.

Is there a problem, Mr Attorney General?

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock