counter statistics
Politics News

Mark Meadows’ case against the January 6 committee could finally close Pelosi’s Kangaroo court

Former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows announced on Tuesday that he will no longer work with the House of Commons committee on January 6 because they do not respect the Executive Privilege and the separation of powers.

“No intention to respect executive privilege boundaries” – Meadows will no longer appear before January 6. Deportation Committee

The next day, the corrupt and biased committee came forward with criminal contempt charges against Meadows.

TRENDING: Mark Meadows’ case against the January 6 committee could finally close Pelosi’s Kangaroo court

January 6 Committee prosecutes with criminal contempt charges against Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows

Later that day (Wednesday), Meadows sued the corrupt speaker Pelosi and the January 6 committee and every member of the corrupt committee.

SHOW: Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows sues Pelosi, Jan. 6 committee

Today Breitbart’s Joel Pollak reported that Meadow’s suit could possibly win and at the same time close the corrupt committee.

The lawsuit makes some well-known arguments, such as that the committee violates the Constitution’s separation of powers by infringing on executive privilege. Former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon, who is being prosecuted by the alleged apolitical Justice Department for contempt of Congress, is making the same case against his subpoena in federal court.

But Meadows goes further, pointing out that the January 6 committee violated the provisions of its own enabling resolution.

The resolution, H. Res. 503, stipulates that the committee “will” consist of 13 members, five of whom will be “appointed after consultation with the minority leader”.

But the committee has only nine members, seven of whom are Democrats, and only two of whom are hand-picked anti-Trump Republicans. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has rejected the five members elected by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (D-CA), an unprecedented move to ensure a unilateral inquiry.

Furthermore, Meadows’ lawsuit points out that while the chairman of the committee may order subpoenas, that authority is not absolute. H. Res. 503 requires the chair of the committee to consult with the ranking member before issuing a summons for a removal. But the committee has no Republican member, which could invalidate the committee’s subpoenas.

If Meadows’ lawsuit is successful, he can not only stop his own subpoena, but he can see the entire committee declared invalid. Pelosi and the Democrats will have to start over – this time, obeying the rules, with five Republican members.

Let’s hope there’s some justice left in the DC court system.

// Load the SDK asynchronously (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); = id; js.src = ""; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, "script", "facebook-jssdk"));

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock