counter statistics
Politics News

The death toll reaches 100, and America’s leftists love it and print more fake news about tornadoes

Gas placement by Bill Hennessey

Tornadoes in Missouri, Illinois, Arkansas, Tennessee and especially Kentucky caused extensive damage and more than 100 deaths. In Kentucky, more than 100 people are feared dead in the collapse of a single Christmas factory where rescue operations continue 24 hours a day.

Yet America’s leftists welcome this news with joy. Why? Two reasons:

  1. Leftists are angry.
  2. Ignorant leftists believe deadly tornadoes are the result of climate change.

TRENDING: EVIL: SNL ‘jokes’ about gang F *** ing Roger Stone’s 75-year-old wife with cancer (VIDEO)

Remember, leftists believe all events, good or bad, are the result of their favorite boomer of the moment. They lack critical thinking skills, largely. Here are some examples of their stupidity and malice:

And no disaster would be complete without Hollywood’s lowest IQ weighing in on its clumsiness:

Now that you know how bad leftists are (and assume all leftists are so ignorant), let’s look at the reality of tornado deaths in the United States.

According to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), deaths from tornadoes per million people have dropped dramatically over the years.

The latest data is available from 2013, but here is the graph:

Look at the green line, which tracks mean deaths per year. It was stable from 1875 to 1925. Then it gradually declined to 2013.

Leftists will say it has become of early warning that allows people to seek cover, and they will be partly right. But they do not take into account the fact that populations became more concentrated during this period. And one F5 tornado in a densely populated area will cause more deaths than the same tornado in a sparsely populated area.

Now we’ll look at the number of tornadoes. Unfortunately, data on annual tornadoes in the US only go back to 1953. And historical data on the number of tornadoes is actually insignificant earlier than about 1970.

Historical tornado counts are useless because, until about the 1970s, only tornadoes experienced by a weather reporter were counted. If a tornado happened and no one saw and reported it, there is no record of it. Coast-to-coast or radar only really showed up in the 1970s. Even today, large parts of the US are outside the scope of weather radar, but populated with satellite data.

During the period shown in the graph above, our ability to detect and count tornadoes steadily grew until the 1990s when ubiquitous coverage was finally achieved.

Which explains why the plot line turned downward in about 2009. It is impossible to say whether the number of tornadoes increased from 1953 to 2009, as our coverage increased during this period. Therefore, tornado deaths are a better measure of the frequency of tornadoes than visitors based on partial historical data.

Considering that the numbers of tornadoes have flattened or decreased since we reached full coverage, it is safe to assume that the moving 10-year average of tornadoes since 1875 has been fairly flat.

But all this math, science, and history is beyond the capabilities of leftists who, like amoebas, merely respond to stimuli with ignorance-based judgments. The left’s rejection of history, seen in their fetish because they destroyed all references to anything that happened before they reached puberty, does not enable America’s left (and most of the population under the age of 40) to any evaluate situation against historical norms. This is why the younger generations (and Pope Francis) judge all who lived before them negatively rather than judge themselves through the eyes of their ancestors.

Here is an example. My great-grandfather was a country doctor who practiced medicine around Lynn and Chamois, Missouri, from about 1880 to 1910 when he moved his family to St. Louis. Louis moved. As a country doctor, dr. William T. Mahon worked with the tools he had available.

In the 1880s, a boy in his neighborhood was kicked by a mule, which crushed his skull. Dr. Mahon removed the bone fragments and relieved cranial pressure, but some of the fragments were too small to reattach. He needed a substance to protect the brain.

His father was also a doctor, but also a blacksmith. (Doctors did not always pay the bills in Lynn, Missouri, in 1880. Doctors needed a second source of income.) The two Doctors Mahon could have formed a piece of iron, but it would have been too heavy. William T. Mahon thus satisfied with the best available alternative: lead.

When I told this story to a modern doctor, he immediately became angry with my great-grandfather. “He could just as well have let the child die,” he said. “To put lead in someone’s body is poisoning. Your grandfather should never have had a medical license. ”

This conversation took place about 115 years after my great-grandfather performed that life-saving cranioplasty with lead, the only reasonable remedy available. I do not know how the boy is doing in the long run, but he has been living at least for a while and with some protection for his brain.

In 1880 we had no idea that lead caused problems in the human body. The first evidence of lead poisoning occurred in the 1920s and only after the invention of tetraethyl lead used in gasoline. As late as 1958, the Surgeon General believed that lead was safe1:

[T]the Surgeon-General concluded in 1958 that a relaxation of the voluntary standard posed no threat to the health of the average American: “During the past 11 years, during which the greatest expansion of tetraethylene lead took place, there was no sign that the average individual in the US has experienced any measurable increase in the concentration of lead in his blood or in the daily output of lead in his urine. ”

It was not until 1973 that the EPA ordered a phasing out of leaded petrol.

It is true that there were suspicions of lead toxicity going back to ancient Greece, but the use of lead only increased for 6,000 years.

The first published report on lead poisoning in children came in 1892, but was brutally attacked by the “authoritative” medical community of the day.2 (Some things never change.)

Doctor Mahon simply did not know that his lead cranioplasty could cause damage to his patient along the way. But that did not stop a 21st century physician from judging my great-grandfather harshly. People of the 21st century tend to judge all previous generations according to what we now know, not what was known and widely accepted at the time.

Therefore, I will forgive Swalwell and Mark Ruffalo and the others who mock those who suffer from Friday’s tornadoes. After being educated in the 21st century, these young leftists cannot possibly know that tornadoes existed even before they were born.

// Load the SDK asynchronously (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); = id; js.src = ""; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, "script", "facebook-jssdk"));

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock